benchgap
OpenAI · model

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max benchmark scores

As of 2026-10-07, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max (OpenAI) has measured scores on 11 benchmarks and estimated scores on 58 more.

BenchmarkScoreSource
AA-GPQA Diamond86.0%measured
AA-HLE25.7%measured
AA-SciCode49.0%estimated ± 3.8 pp, high confidence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index23.7%measured
CritPt5.7%measured
GDPval-AA15.6%estimated ± 12.5 pp, low confidence
GPQA Diamond84.6%estimated ± 2.2 pp, high confidence
HLE38.5%estimated ± 9.5 pp, medium confidence
IFBench68.6%estimated ± 6.9 pp, medium confidence
AA-LCR69.3%measured
AA-Omniscience Accuracy39.9%measured
SciCode43.9%estimated ± 2.9 pp, low confidence
IFEval93.4%estimated ± 1.3 pp, high confidence
LongBench v261.5%estimated ± 5.9 pp, medium confidence
τ²-bench results83.0%measured
AA Coding Index50.7%estimated ± 6.8 pp, medium confidence
AA-MMMU-Pro72.5%measured
APEX-Agents-AA2.3%estimated ± 11.4 pp, low confidence
BioMysteryBench (human-difficult)40.9%estimated ± 5.9 pp, low confidence
SWE-bench Verified75.8%estimated ± 4.4 pp, high confidence
BFCL v459.0%estimated ± 9.8 pp, low confidence
SWE-bench Pro56.5%estimated ± 2.1 pp, high confidence
AA Agentic Index20.1%estimated ± 12.3 pp, low confidence
MMLU-Pro85.7%estimated ± 3.5 pp, high confidence
GPQA87.8%estimated ± 3.2 pp, high confidence
AA-IFBench70.0%measured
AA EnterpriseOps-Gym26.8%estimated ± 3.6 pp, low confidence
ARC-AGI-169.4%estimated ± 5.4 pp, medium confidence
ARC-AGI-229.2%estimated ± 14.2 pp, low confidence
CursorBench 3.259.1%estimated ± 7.2 pp, low confidence
FrontierCode 1.1 Main9.2%estimated ± 4.3 pp, low confidence
OfficeQA Pro50.3%estimated ± 7.2 pp, low confidence
Vals GPQA Diamond81.8%estimated ± 7.4 pp, medium confidence
Vals LiveCodeBench83.6%measured
Vals MMLU-Pro86.8%estimated ± 2.2 pp, high confidence
Vals SWE-bench73.2%estimated ± 6.3 pp, medium confidence
VulcanBench v382.7%estimated ± 5.6 pp, low confidence
AA ITBench55.1%estimated ± 3.6 pp, low confidence
HLE w/o tools22.6%estimated ± 5.7 pp, medium confidence
PostTrainBench v1.119.9%estimated ± 10.5 pp, low confidence
Vibe Code Bench22.2%measured
CharXiv75.5%estimated ± 7.5 pp, low confidence
CharXiv w/o tools78.0%estimated ± 2.4 pp, medium confidence
C-Eval92.5%estimated ± 1.0 pp, medium confidence
MathVision81.7%estimated ± 4.9 pp, high confidence
MCP-Tasks74.0%estimated ± 8.2 pp, low confidence
MMLU-Redux96.6%estimated ± 1.1 pp, medium confidence
MMMU-Pro75.8%estimated ± 4.4 pp, medium confidence
ScreenSpot Pro71.2%estimated ± 10.7 pp, low confidence
SuperGPQA81.1%estimated ± 7.5 pp, medium confidence
ERQA51.8%estimated ± 3.9 pp, high confidence
HealthBench Hard15.1%estimated ± 7.7 pp, low confidence
MedXpertQA (MM)64.5%estimated ± 6.5 pp, low confidence
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)98.5%estimated ± 4.0 pp, low confidence
React Native Evals70.3%estimated ± 3.0 pp, low confidence
SWE-Rebench41.1%estimated ± 6.5 pp, low confidence
ARC-AGI-31.7%estimated ± 3.4 pp, medium confidence
BioMysteryBench (human-solvable)81.8%estimated ± 0.6 pp, low confidence
HealthBench (raw)34.6%estimated ± 6.4 pp, low confidence
HealthBench (length-adjusted)53.9%estimated ± 3.7 pp, low confidence
HealthBench Professional57.7%estimated ± 4.8 pp, low confidence
HealthBench Professional (raw)46.0%estimated ± 5.0 pp, low confidence
HLE-Verified15.3%estimated ± 2.0 pp, low confidence
LABBench271.0%estimated ± 1.8 pp, low confidence
MMMU81.0%estimated ± 0.9 pp, high confidence
MMLU93.3%estimated ± 1.1 pp, low confidence
MMMU-Pro w/ Python77.0%estimated ± 1.6 pp, high confidence
RealWorldQA83.5%estimated ± 1.2 pp, low confidence
OmniDocBench 1.510.9%estimated ± 6.4 pp, low confidence