benchgap
Calibration

BrowseComp → CyberGym

CyberGym is estimated from BrowseComp with a Michaelis–Menten curve fitted on 13 models measured on both: y = 2.0000·x / (1.27417 + x), R² = 0.52, cross-validated error 4.6 pp. It is used for 21 estimates.

Estimated modelBrowseCompCyberGymSource
Agents-A1-4B66.8%68.8%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
Claude Opus 4.884.3%79.6%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
GLM-4.752.0%58.0%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
GPT-5.265.8%68.1%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
GPT-5.4 Pro89.3%82.4%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
GPT-5.5 Pro90.1%82.8%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
Inkling77.1%75.4%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
Inkling-Small77.4%75.6%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
Kimi K2.683.2%79.0%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
Kimi K2.560.6%64.5%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)60.6%64.5%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
Ling 3.0 Flash72.2%72.3%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse48.6%55.2%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
MiniMax M383.5%79.2%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP436.8%44.8%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B63.8%66.7%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
Qwen3.5-27B61.0%64.8%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B61.0%64.8%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
Qwen3.5 397B62.0%65.5%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence
Beam77.4%75.6%estimated ± 4.6 pp, high confidence
Solar Pro 449.2%55.7%estimated ± 4.6 pp, medium confidence